Picture posting rules can be found here. ![]() | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |
Click daily on the three right hand logos to give food and aid. |
|||
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
desicrowefan |
re | ||
|
I ate a whole pack of Big League Chew in a sitting once - not the greatest feeling after. Still like it though, mmm...sugar...
|
|||
Gitsie007 |
|||
|
I thought big league chew was bubble gum.
For me, my favorite is grape flavored bubble gum. I also like pop rocks, fun dip, pixie stix and reeses peanut butter cups. ![]() |
|||
Kira Scurro |
|||
|
you know, i've really been enjoying these visits the news shows have been making to neverland. like everyone else, i thought i knew what the place would be like, but it's proven to be much more than that. without all that gaudy furniture and knickknacks that michael had in there (too much stuff) it really is a beautiful place. the house is gorgeous and laid out so interestingly, so there's never an end. each room seems to have more than one entrance. the grounds are just serene, wonderfully soothing. i hope they do turn it into a monument like graceland. they're worried it might be too far away for tourists, but i have a feeling people will go to
great lengths to see the place. even the santa barbara residents are torn. some are afraid it'll be over run, others welcome the tourists, the more the
merrier. here's some pics, but they don't compare to what the videos conveyed.
larry king's show tonite, particularly.
Let us allow the world and our visitors to taste a few drops of the magic elixir that is the metaphysical mix between the beautiful santa ynez valley sculpted by the soft hands of god, and the warm and kind environment crafted by the hands of its residents. |
|||
lindylulu |
|||
|
I visited the Santa Ynez Valley a few years ago and we drove by the place. It's a nice property, and there are many other properties in the area that are
also beautiful.
|
|||
desicrowefan |
re | ||
|
Gitsie - yeah, it is - I figure the sweetness is what draws me in. I've never had grape, just the original bubble gum.
eta: Oh hah, I get it now - that it was gum - yeah, this was kinda back in the day where I didn't realize you don't swallow gum, lol.
Last Edited By: desicrowefan
Jul 3, 2009 9:46 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
8bestfriends |
|||
|
I meant to watch LK last night, but forgot.
Thanks for the pic link. I'd love to have a pool like that in my backyard. |
|||
may2 |
|||
|
From Linda Stasi
But, no, it was the death of Michael Jackson, a drug-addled, creepy-beyond-words, accused pedophile who literally bought his children with the help of two brood mares and, apparently, his dermatologist -- a group of amoral savages who had no problem giving their kids to a man who looked like the Phantom of the Opera and who behaved like a depraved worm. You can call it "adoption," but I call it child-trafficking. OK, I said it -- and it's about time somebody had the nerve to say what millions of people must feel and believe about the once-talented black man who turned himself into a white woman before turning himself into a monster. But you'd never know any of that if you'd listened for the past week to the endless prattle from the sickening, fawning media and all those Hollywood music phonies who were crying crocodile tears over someone they'd mostly avoided like, well, a pedophile. Even the president of the United States felt compelled to issue a statement. Are you kidding me? I say all this not just as some casual bystander to the Michael Jackson freak show -- though I was a Jacko freak back in 1993, when I was as in awe of him as the rest of the world. But then one day, a friend came to see me at my office at another newspaper and everything changed. "My cousin's boy's been hijacked by Michael Jackson," he said. He pulled out two photos of the boy, Jordie Chandler, with Jackson. They were dressed alike -- in fedoras, little black suits, each wearing one freaking glove. They were on a roller-coaster -- in Europe. Jordie's mother had remarried, and his stepfather had introduced her to Jackson. Within weeks, the sleepovers among Jackson and her gorgeous 13-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter began. The boy broke down and told his father that he'd been molested at Jackson's playground, Neverland Ranch, and in Europe. The dad, a dentist-to-the-stars and screenwriter, contacted authorities, and shortly thereafter was jumped and beaten bloody in a garage. His home was broken into, and thugs menaced patients in his waiting room. The authorities told him it might be best if he and his son disappeared for a while. They settled for more than $20 million. The father took the boy underground, and he had plastic surgery and disguised himself for safety. Dental practice destroyed, screenwriting career over, family in tatters. Jackson walked free -- or as free as a tortured soul can be -- to repeat over and over again his hideous tricks with children at Neverland, a place straight out of "Hansel and Gretel." It is in this very spot where his family wanted to put on their grotesque public display of his sadly emaciated, needle-marked body, reportedly to be dressed "like a prince," as though he has become one of the garish statues upon which he loved to drop millions in Las Vegas hotel tchotchke shops. Another circus of the macabre to add to the horror that became Michael Jackson's life. This is the kind of madness that's followed Jackson's death -- everyone is acting as though the world has lost one of its greatest men. The King of Pop was a great entertainer -- innovative beyond anyone the world had ever seen -- but he turned into a disgustingly depraved man who hung an infant off a balcony and forced his kids to walk around with masks, veils, towels and even nets over their faces. Great men don't pretend to be childlike to disguise their depravities. Shameful. The king is dead, and I for one am not crying.
GOCUBSGO
|
|||
Nysha2 |
|||
if this is my belief, who are you to confront me about it? An anonymous poster on a bulletin board mostly devoted to Russell Crowe? If you post your beliefs here, everyone who reads them & has posting privileges can confront you about them. You are free to defend them or not. At the end of the day, you're still going to believe what you want about MJ; the act of being questioned about those beliefs is not going to taint or turn them unless you want it to. I think MJ was a pedophile & emotionally disturbed weirdo and that taints everything I feel about his music. I feel sorry for his children who have been raised in a fantasy bubble & who are now going to be dragged through a custody battle by people who are pretty much strangers to them. |
|||
SweetJulls |
|||
if this is my belief, who are you to confront me about it? You posted your "belief" in a public message forum - key word being public, ergo you wanted it out there. If you didn't want it questioned, you shouldn't have posted it. See the word "PUBLIC" in my post? That means any of us has the unalienable right to comment. Frankly I was going to stay out of this, but your comment about me calling Ray Charles a junkie when he himself said it about his life more than once, went too far for me. You started this shitstorm, so frankly you should expect to have to ride it out and take what comes. If you don't like it, perhaps next time think twice about posting it.
"If the Republicans will stop telling lies about us, we'll stop telling the truth about them." ~ Adlai Stevenson
|
|||
Im Just Jules |
|||
|
ITA with what Nysha said, although I am still able to enjoy his music. After I formed the belief that he was a pedophile, I wouldn't have paid for it any
longer, but can still enjly listening.
I also think that his popularity as a young child probably caused people of a certain ilk in the white community to make comments like "Aww, that little colored boy sure is cute" and "Well, you know they sure do have more rhythm than we do" etc, moreso than spurring on the civil rights movement, but that's just me. |
|||
desicrowefan |
re | ||
|
If I say how I feel more than once (and include 'articles') too, then maybe it will make it true! |
|||
Mimmilina |
|||
desicrowefan wrote: Touché!
The more you post = the more right you are. |
|||
SweetJulls |
|||
The more you post = the more right you are. Ah, the Republican Party's mantra!
"If the Republicans will stop telling lies about us, we'll stop telling the truth about them." ~ Adlai Stevenson
|
|||
desicrowefan |
re | ||
|
|
|||
SweetJulls |
|||
Good point!
"If the Republicans will stop telling lies about us, we'll stop telling the truth about them." ~ Adlai Stevenson
|
|||
heatmiserfl |
|||
Kira Scurro wrote:Your guilty conscience.
"I used my Obama tax cut to buy tea bags for the protest against increased taxes." By KarenT. (won Huffington Post
caption contest for captioning photo of a tea party protester)
|
|||
vlferrantello |
|||
|
well, WTF, I'm catching up on this thread and it became one about segregation and black maids?
Let me say, catching up here: Evany - you live in Canada, did you live in the US during segregation? Did you live in the US after the Civil Rights bill? can you personally say that you lived the differences and know those nuances? I think from your perspective as a learned academic reading about it just doesn't equate to living it......was MJ as important to civil rights as MLK? IMHO, no, but he certainly ranks up there directly behind him....my son was born the year the schools in my city were desegregated......he never experienced what I did BUT he loved MTV....and in his opinion MJ paved the way for other blacks to get major airtime on MTV and VH1 - which none of them were getting until MJ and Thriller.....and this from a kid who had the first Rap radio station on the internet and has a rap group.....MJ helped finish what Elvis started - taking what was generally considered as "black" music and made it mainstream and non threatening. (edited to add: MJ was born in the segregated US of the 1950's and began performing when we were segregated with "black" venues, "black" hotels/motels, "black" restrooms, "black" water fountains, so IMO he straddled both of those worlds....he watched the US change from the perspective of a black man - something not one of us can relate to) Evany - have you ever practiced law in the US? or International Law? my, my you really seem to speak from a position of authority about US probate law and California probate law.....care to enlighten us as to your experience in that area? I just finished - yesterday - an estate return for which I am the executor.....I'm trustee of multiple clients trusts and exector as well.....in Texas, you can name a guardian in your will, but the courts have final say......they always have final say......any will can be contested, any section of a will can be contested, and any will can be overruled by a judge.....but it is incredibly expensive for both sides.....but what is interesting is that while those contesting must pay their own legal bills, the executor/guardian they are contesting (named in the will) have their legal bills paid by the estate....so those that are after an estate in which they didn't receive all they wanted actually can deplete it while fighting over it.....the naming of a guardian in a will does not force those named to be guardian.....while the judges give a great deal of weight to the parents last wishes, they have the awful task of looking at it from all angles and can overrule a will as to the guardianship.... I always find it interesting that those who profess to not read tabloids bring up tabloid trash to foster their OPINION on another individual....this thread has become a mirror of another one in which I participated where people pronounced their personal opionion on a father because of an incident.....and made extreme pronouncements about an individual they had never met. I'm a firm believer that until you have walked in someones shoes it impossible to know how they feel, how they acted, and why they acted. This was an incredibly talented man who lived a life in a fishbowl....because his life was not what someone considers their "norm", then he's a pervert....how can any one of you know how profoundly his childhood effected him? or the measures he took to try to "get over it"?....or his thoughts about his father? photos of the man walking down the street with his father tell you absolutely nothing about their personal relationship. I personally have had clients settle an issue out of court when the lawsuit was totally unfounded because of its effect on their family, their life, and the cost.....and just last week Larry King said that he was going to testify in the molestation trial.....he was at a restaurant and overheard two attorneys talking about how they were going to milk MJ for millions (I'm paraphrasing).....now IMHO, I'm going to believe Larry King did overhear this and felt strongly enough that he was going to testify under oath and the threat of committing perjury.....and I'll believe that over tabloid trash......I have absolutely no idea what the final truth is in that matter.....but when someone sues for $'s against a rich man I'm usually suspicious as to their motives. On another note, the MJ estate will have 9 months in which to do a preliminary calculation of his estate value as the estate taxes are due then....they can receive a 6 months extension to actually file the return (not public record), and in some very limited instances get a delay in estate tax payments....considering how ill-liquid his estate is, his executors have a mountain to climb in valuations, renogitiating notes, and probably borrowing money to actually make the estate tax payments while at the same time trying to deal with the legal mess.....in Texas, the guardianship is handled by an entirely different court than probate issues, so it can become very very expensive and time consuming to deal with all of it. The method he used to name his beneficiaries in a trust and not in a will is a very common one.....probate filings of a will are public record....simultaneously setting up a trust to receive all the assets of your estate (as named in the will), keeps the details of your beneficiaries, their allocations, etc totally secret from the world at large.....trust documents are not usually filed in any court of law and only the attorneys, those named, and the IRS are privy to the details....so unless something extraordinary happens where this document is actually filed in court we will never truly know its contents.....in Texas you do have to file an "inventory" of all assets passing via the will (that is assets that do not have a specific beneficiary listed directly with the asset - the most common are retirement plans and life insurance policies - but grantor trusts can have the same issue) with the court - and I think California has the same requirement....but since we do not know how he actually had his assets titled we can't know if these will ever be made public. I did hear mention somewhere that even if his record sales were not going through the roof, his estate will be more liquid than his life.... I chose to remember this man as one of the greatest entertainers of his time....and I will ignore those who wish to continually trash someone they never met and lived in circumstances they cannot understand or fathom. May this man can finally get some peace.... We make a living by what we get, We make a life by what we give. - Sir Winston Churchill
Last Edited By: vlferrantello
Jul 3, 2009 5:22 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Evany2 |
|||
|
Vl, nice of you to drop by to tell me how much I don't know. The problem is that if you had properly read the thread, you would know that I specifically said that you can't lock in the transfer of guardianship of you children in your will so I'm not clear about your demand that I tell supply you with some sort of credential for saying that when, you do claim authority in the area, and you are saying exactly the same thing that I was. Secondly, the civil rights discussion isn't about what Kira may say about her personal life nor is it about whether Michael Jackson played a role in black history, it is about whether or not Michael Jackson was as important to civil rights in the US as Martin Luther King. . I do not have to be black, or American or have lived through segregation to be able to challenge that claim any more than I have to be a Jew, or have lived in Nazi Germany to tell a Holocaust denier that they they are inventing history; or to be a doctor, or even a scientist, to challenge a claim that smoking does not cause lung cancer etc., etc. And, if learning from books and other sources is not valuable then we'd still be living in caves. You also seem to have assumed all sorts of things about my personal life that you don't have a clue about. I certainly never told you any of those things about me that you seem to hold as fact, nor have I ever said anything even remotely similar on any board on which I've ever posted. I don't have a clue where you get all that from but assume it's from other posters on some private board you are posting on who also claim to know all sorts of things about me that they don't. (edited to add that I did tell you, and everyone else for that matter that I'm Canadian and that isn't what I was referring to.) Anyway, my understanding is that this is a discussion board and no one has to claim some sort of credential to state their opinion. I also find it fascinating, that there was a lot of comment from posters who seem to have the same opinion as I do and you don't seem to have any demand that they put forward their credentials. If you want to raise some legitimate source that you want to quote to challenge my views, then I welcome that because I'm here for the discussion but please, when you're quoting your authority, I'd appreciate it if you were actually responding to things I said. You might find that you have less to disagree with me about than you think. ETA: Sorry, but I forgot to add that if your comments about quoting tabs is directed at me, you are also mistaken on that point. I haven't quoted a single source that was even remotely a tab. The only tab stories I've read on any of this are the ones posted here that I've read because a poster had suggested that we do so. If you think that only the tabs think that there are very serious issues with Jackson's attitudes and his behaviour, that isn't the case at all. These issues were all covered in great detail by the legitimate news media.
Last Edited By: Evany2
Jul 3, 2009 7:06 PM.
Edited 3 times.
|
|||
hando49 |
|||
|
Both Linda Stasi and the NY post are right wing fanatics........you can't trust what any of them say.
A life in tatters? Dental career ruined? Oh really? That guy walked away with 20 million dollars......I don't feel sorry for him. And once again, nothing was proven and just last week Larry King said that he was going to testify in the molestation trial.....he was at a restaurant and overheardVL, you go girl.......I loooooooooved your post! "The tears of the world are a constant quality. For each one who begins to
Last Edited By: hando49
Jul 3, 2009 7:20 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Karencrowes |
|||
|
Evany, I just noticed that when I thanked you for providing the thread for Limbaugh's comment about Jackson, I posted it in the wrong thread
Your Signature ... "Do the best job you can seeing the truth, and then do the best job you can telling the truth. Risk whatever you have to risk, because ultimately, it's probably not going to be as much as you think it is. Even if it is, at least you will have collapsed, been fired, shot at, or whatever for good reason rather than something stupid or self-serving." -- Keith Olbermann GOBAMA!! |
|||